Archive | Ukrainian Historical Journal
Киридон А.М. - Студії пам’яті у сучасній гуманітаристиці: історія становлення (2017)

  ARCHIVE (All issues) /     Content (2017, Issue 4)Ukrainian English

Kyrydon A.

Memory Studies in Modern Humanitarism: History of Development

Section: Methodology. Historiography. Sources

Abstract: The purpose of the research is to analyze the history of the formation of memory studies as a new direction in scientific research; to characterize the main tendencies and stages of development in Western science and national discourse. The research methodology is manifested in multilevel (general scientific methodology, the specific subject, concrete-subject, etc.) and based on the principles of interdisciplinary, systematic, scientific, comparative studies, and others. The scientific novelty: for the first time in Ukrainian historiography is an attempt to analyze the stages of formation of memory studies in European and national dimensions. The current state of humanitarian research is determined by the emergence and evolution of new research paradigms, blurring of the limits of traditional disciplines, and the active development of interdisciplinary studies. Extension of the theoretical horizon, methodological and categorical apparatus in the academic environment also actualized the problem of "memory" research in particular. The history of the formation of memory studies as a new direction in scientific research is considered in the article. The main tendencies and stages of development in Western science and national discourse are the subject of research. The main results of the study / Conclusions. The current state of humanities is characterized by a fundamental restructuring of the whole body of social science, laying new principles and cognitive installations. Not an exception is the actualization of the phenomenon of "memory" as a subject of scientific research in various areas of knowledge – history, sociology, cultural studies, philosophy, political science, ethnography, psychology, etc. The formation of initial principles and the development of the theoretical foundations of "memory studies" traced in the chronological range of the late nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries. The study of social memory in social sciences and humanities was initiated in the 1920s in the West in the research area of sociology and social anthropology. The revival of interest in social memory in the western tradition appears in the 1960's on the basis of paradigmatic changes in social and humanitarian knowledge. Studies were mostly culturological and philosophical. The interdisciplinary trend in the analysis of social and cultural phenomena and processes – "memory studies" that focused on the study of collective memorization and collective amnesia – began to emerge during the 1980s and for the next two decades reached a certain level of theoretical, methodological and organizational maturity. At the turn of the 1980-1990s, social and human sciences are experiencing a real "memorial boom." The concepts of memory (memory, obliteration, nostalgia, and resentiment) became the key categories of socio-cultural analysis. At the beginning of the 2000s we can talk about the formation of a peculiar phenomenon of "turning to memory," which crystallized on the basis of the workings of predecessors from the late nineteenth century. At the same time, the process of the origin and development of scientific interest in the problem of memory as a phenomenon of collective is characterized by distinct national features, variability temporal and spatial framework and so on. The peculiarity of the development of domestic memory researches is that Ukraine is late in entering postmodern and "memory boom". As a result, a dual process can be traced: on the one hand, attempts to engage in studies on memory research, taking over accumulated mainly western methodology, on the other hand, the search for a national identity leads to the construction of its own narrative and the design of the corresponding conceptual and categorical apparatus. The article analyzes the reasons for updating the study of memorable meanings, the stages of formation of memory studies in general, features of the development of memory studies in Ukraine.

Keywords: collective memory, memory studies, historiography, sociohumanitaristics, history, stages.



Author(s) citation:

Cite:
Kyrydon A. (2017). Memory Studies in Modern Humanitarism: History of Development. Ukrainian Historical Journal, ( 4) 150-161. (In Ukrainian). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2017.04.150


References:

  1. Bergson, A. (1992). Materiya i pamyat'. Bergson A. Soch.. Per. s fr. M.: Moskovskij klub (Vol. 1, pp. 160-316). [in Russian].
  2. Connerton, P.(1983). How societies remember. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. [in English].
  3. Daxin, A. V. (2010). Obshhestvennoe razvitie i vyzovy kollektivnoj pamyati: perspektiva filosofskoj konceptualizacii memory studies. Voprosy filosofii, 8, 42-44. [in Russian].
  4. Daxin, A. V. (2012). Pamyat', istoriya, Vselennaya: na puti k novoj ontoldogii real'nosti. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 1 (3). [in Russian].
  5. Daxin, A. V. (2008). Prostranstvo organizacionnoj pamyati. Gumanitarnaya geografiya. Nauchnyj i kul'turnoprosvetitel'nyj al'manax, 5, 270-272. [in Russian].
  6. Daxin, A. V. (2008). Spory vokrug «Bronzovogo soldata»: Psixologicheskie korni konflikta v svete memory studies. Kosmopolis, 1(20), 86-88. [in Russian].
  7. Durkheim, É. (1965). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1915). Engl. transl. by Joseph Ward Swain. New York. [in English].
  8. Havbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [in English].
  9. Hobsbawm, E., Ranger, T. (Eds.) (1983). The Invention of Tradition. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. [in English].
  10. Hobsbaum, E., Rejndzher, T. (Eds.). (2005). Vynajdennia tradytsii. Trans. Mykoly Klymchuka. Kyiv: Nika-tsentr. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Jurkovich, R., Paelink, J. H. P. (Eds.). (1984). Problems in Interdisciplinary Studies. Brookfield. [in English].
  12. Kas'ianov, H.V. (2016). Istorychna pam'iat' ta istorychna polityka: do pytannia pro terminolohiiu j henealohiiu poniat'. Ukrains'kyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 2, 118-137. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Klymchuk, M. (2005) «Past end Prezent»: vynakhidnyky tradytsij (peredmova perekladacha) (Hobsbaum, E., Rejndzher, T. (Eds.) Vynajdennia tradytsii. Trans. Mykoly Klymchuka. Kyiv: Nika-tsentr. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Kocklemans, J. (Ed.) (1979). Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education. University Park. [in English].
  15. Konnerton, P. (2004). Yak suspil'stva pam'iataiut'.(Shlipchenko S. (per. z anhl., nauk. red.). Kyiv: Nika-tsentr. (Seriia «Zmina paradyhmy». Vyp. 7). [in Ukrainian].
  16. Koposov, N. (2011). Pamyat' strogogo rezhima: Istoriya i politika Rossii. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. [in Russian].
  17. Kostov, S.V. (n. d.) Otechestvennaya social'naya istoriya: voprosy istoriografii i metodologi. [in Russian].
  18. Laas, N. O. (2009). Retsenziia na vydannia : Ukraina moderna. Vyp.4 (15): Pam'iat' iak pole zmahan'. Kyiv: Krytyka, 2009. Ukrains'kyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal,1, 209-213. [in Ukrainian].
  19. Mol', A. (1987). Sociodinamika kul'tury. M.: Progress. [in Russian].
  20. Nahorna, L. (2012). Istorychna pam'iat'. Teorii, dyskursy, refleksii. Kyiv: IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Nora, P. (2014). Teperishnie, natsiia, pam'iat'. (Riepa A. (per. iz frants.). Kyiv: TOV «Vydavnytstvo «KLIO». [in Ukrainian].
  22. Olick, J., Robinson, J. (1998). Social Memory Studies: From «Collective Memory» to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practics. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105-140. [in English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105
  23. Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. Interdisciplinarity. Problems of teaching and research in universities. [in English].
  24. Pogukaeva, N. V. (2006). Tematicheskij analiz kak metodologicheskaya ornientaciya social'nyx issledovanij nauki. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta,12, 14-19. [in Russian].
  25. Pomorski, J. (1995). Paradygmat «New Economic History». Droga do «Nobla». Lublin. [ in Polish]
  26. Pomors'kyj, Ya. (2005). Mizh naukoiu i mystetstvom: istoriia na zlami tysiacholit'. Ukraina moderna. Kyiv–L'viv: Krytyka.[in Ukrainian].
  27. Rakitov, A. I. (1982). Istoricheskoe poznanie: Sistemno-gnoseologicheskij podxod Moskva: Politizdat. [in Russian].
  28. Repina, L. (2011). Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX-XXI vv.: social'nye teorii i istoriograficheskaya praktika. Moskva: Krug. [in Russian].
  29. Repina, L. (2004). Social'naya pamyat' i istoricheskaya kul'tura srednevekovoj Evropy (k itogam raboty nad proektom). Dialog so vremenem. Al'manax intellektual'noj istorii, 12, 5-18. [in Russian].
  30. Repina, L. (Ed.) (2006). Istoriya i pamyat': istoricheskaya kul'tura Evropy do nachala Novogo vremeni M.: Krug. [in Russian].
  31. Shils, E.(1981). Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [in English].
  32. Troian, S. (2013). Doslidnyts'kyj tsentr natsional'noho prymyrennia v Slovenii. In A.M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  33. Troian, S. (2013). Yevropejs'koi pam'iati j sumlinnia platforma. In A.M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  34. Troian, S. (2013). Instytut natsional'noi pam'iati (INP) (Pol'scha). In A.M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  35. Troian, S. (2013). Instytut natsional'noi pam'iati (INP) (Slovachchyna). In A.M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  36. Troian, S. (2013). Tsentr doslidzhennia henotsydu i rukhu oporu zhyteliv Lytvy. In A.M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  37. Troian, S. (2013). Federal'nyj upovnovazhenyj iz dokumentiv Sluzhby Derzhavnoi Bezpeky kolyshn'oi NDR. In A. M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  38. Troian, S., Ohiienko, V. (2013). Estons'kyj instytut istorychnoi pam'iati. In A. M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  39. Troian S., Ohiienko V. (2013). Instytut doslidzhennia totalitarnykh rezhymiv. In A. M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  40. Troian S., Ohiienko V. (2013). Instytut istorii uhors'koi revoliutsii 1956 r. In A.M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  41. Troian, S., Ohiienko, V. (2013). Instytutsii pam'iati ta polityka pam'iati v Bolharii. In A. M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  42. Troian, S., Ohiienko, V. (2013). Instytutsii pam'iati ta polityka pam'iati v Latvii. In A. M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  43. Troian, S., Ohiienko, V. (2013). Instytutsii pam'iati ta polityka pam'iati v Rumunii. In A. M. Kyrydon (Ed.) Natsional'na ta istorychna pam'iat': slovnyk kliuchovykh terminiv. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  44. Trubeckoj, S. N. (1994). O prirode chelovecheskogo soznaniya. Trubeckoj, S. N. Soch. Moskva: Mysl'. [in Russian].
  45. Vasil'ev, A. G.(2012). Kul'turnaya pamyat'/zabvenie i nacional'naya identichnost': teoreticheskie osnovaniya analiza. Kul'turnaya pamyat' v konteste formirovaniya nacional'noj identichnosti Rossii v XXI veke: Kollektivnaya monografiya / Ros. in-t kul'turologi; otv. red. N. A. Kochelyaeva. M.: Sovpadenie.[in Russian].
  46. Vasil'ev, A. G. (2012). «Osevoe vremya» memory studies: rossijskij sled. Kul'turnaya pamyat': Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovatelej kul'tury. [in Russian].
  47. Volianiuk, O. Ya. (2013). Suspil'na pam'iat' i polityka: Mystetstvo mozhlyvoho. Kyiv: DP «NVTs «Priorytety». [in Ukrainian].
  48. Xatton, P. (2003). Istoriya kak iskusstvo pamyati. Per. s angl. V. Yu. Bystrova. SPb.: Izd-vo «Vladimir Dal'». [in Russian].
  49. Young, James E. (1993). The Textures of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven: Connel UP. [in English].
  50. Zelizer, B. (1995). Reading the Past Against the Grain: Yhe Shape of Memory Studies. Critical Studies in Mass Comunication. Vol. 12, 2, pp. 214-239; [in English].
  51. Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. – Chicago. [in English].
  52. Zerubavel, Y. (1986). The Holiday Cycle and the Commemoration of the Past: Folklore, History, and Education. Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress of Jewish Studies(Jerusalem), 4, 111-118. [in English].
  53. Zerubavel', Ya. (2004). Dinamika kollektivnoj pamyati. Ab imperio, 3. [in Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2004.0167
  54. Zerubavel,Y., Barnett, B. (1986). The Recovery of Masada: A Study in Collective Memory. Sociological Quarterly, vol. 27, 2, 147-164. [in English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00254.x